Archive for the ‘Film: Feature’ Category

CFAC – Day 3: Eyes Wide Shut

Nanu Advent Day 3

So, it's back to work on Monday, and so begins one of the longest stretches of work you will ever encounter. Coming up to Christmas, time changes, as excitement is replaced by tedium. You work all week, and it doesn't seem to come closer. What's more, in every waking moment. You become alienated from the world – where the fuck is family and Christmas? Why am I working so much to pay for things I don't need? Why is the world so weird? What the fuck have trees got to do with Christ? You need a film to help you feel lost, and alienated. You need some good cinema. You need…

Eyes Wide Shut (1999)

Stanley Kubrick, 159 Minutes

The incredible film sees Stanley Kubrick work with Tom Cruise and Nicole Kidman, exposing love and ritual in the most bizarre way. As with most Kubrick films, the cinematography is incredible, but at nearly 3 hours long it's a film that will test your patience, as much as the world tests Cruise's character. But it is everything odd and unusual in one package. If you've never seen it, then you must – take the time out of your day to at least see it once. If you have seen it before, then go onto the IMDB trivia section, and look at how much got changed before having another watch, and think to yourself – where are they now? It isn't a Christmas film in the strictest sense of the word, but the oddness of Christmas and community are exposed in a wonderful – and I guaran

-04.html”>dog food bladder stones

tee some of the sequences will make you feel cold. If you can, grab a copy in high definition, and watch this before Christmas really sets in, and you end up being too tied up to give this film the viewing it deserves.

Honestly though, it's a tough watch and may not be to everyone's tastes. Furthermore, it won't

be the film that Kubrick wanted you to see, which adds to the mystery of it all. But if you don't fancy watching this – and this is only an excuse for those of you who have seen it before, as I urge you to watch it the once in your life – then the alternative film is another kind of oddness.

The Monastery: Mr. Vig and the Nun (2006)

Pernille Rose Grønkjær, 84 mins

This documentary looks at the life of Mr. Vig, and very elderly bachelor who bought up a castle with the explicit aim of turning it into a monastery. Realising his ambitions, as the last pieces fall into place, this documentary explores the complexities of realising your dreams. The fact that Mr Vig looks kind of like Santa Claus makes this one of the loosest possible Christmas films, but you should watch it anyway to explore Christmas in a different kind of way. Once again, this will be difficult to find but worth the effort if you can get your hands on a copy.

zp8497586rq
zp8497586rq

CFAC Day 2: Die Hard

Nanu Advent Day 2

So the first Sunday of the month, and you are a bit Christmassed out from the . After all, it's only really getting started, and you don't want to blow your load to soon. It's too early to go Christmas shopping, but you still wanna watch a good, solid Sunday night film. I have the perfect thing for you.

Die Hard (1988)

John McTiernan, 131 mins

Unlike yesterday's effort, this title creeps into the top ten of Christmas film lists for other reasons. Sure, it's a great film. It's a film you can watch any Sunday, of any year. It won't age. It's a timeless action flick that defined Bruce Willis' career for 20 years, and cemented his role as the action star of our hearts – and what's more, it's the best time he's played that role. But it's in every list as the Christmas film that people always remember being a Christmas film when people say what's your favourite Christmas film, but actually really isn't a Christmas film. You know? That's why I wanted to get it out of the way early, so people would stop chatting about Die Hard being the greatest Christmas film – it isn't, but it's ideal for this time of the year. Watch it now so that when people talk about it as the best Christmas film for the rest of December, it'll be fresh in your mind and you'll sound the expert.

Here we see some critical analysis of the film, back when it was released on vhs:

I don't know why you are still reading this, you know already from the moment I said Die Hard that you want to go see it, so treat yourself – I guarantee you've not seen it nearly recently enough, even if the last time you saw it was last night. It's

d9.html”>coupon for dog food

c.html”>aeroponic nutrient solution

f.html”>aquaponics zoning

cold outside – do yourself a favour and go watch this film. It's over two hours long and it never feels like it for a second.

Okay, so you've already seen Die Hard, literally this morning, twice, and you don't fancy watching it for the third time today. I can understand entirely – but you still need the kind of Sunday night film that everyone can enjoy? Fine, give this alternative film a try…

The Ice Harvest (2005)

Harold Ramis, 95 mins

The Ice Harvest

John Cusack as you've not seen him before. Look out for him later in the month

John Cusack turns up later in our advent calendar for perhaps one of my favourite Christmas films, but this one is often forgotten – and in many minds, completely unknown.

Set on Christmas eve, it's about a crime on the night before the big day, and it is debatable if this has more right to be a Christmas film, but at least it doesn't skimp on strippers, violence or fun. It's no Die Hard – but then what is? Die Hard. Watch Die Hard already. Even Die Hard 2 struggles to come close to Die Hard. Watch Mother Fucking Die Hard – then watch this. You done that yet? Yes. Good.

Merry Christmas.

Editor's Note: It just so happens that the excellent Cry Baby Comedy will be hosting a Die Hard event for Christmas this coming Friday 7th December at the Banshee Labyrinth. Comedy and Die Hard on a big screen with an audience too – cracking night, go check it out!

zp8497586rq
zp8497586rq
zp8497586rq
zp8497586rq

CFAC Day 1: The Muppet Christmas Carol

Nanu Advent Day 1

First of all, welcome to CFAC – the Christmas Film Advent Calendar to end all advent calendars – a guide to the best Christmas films that you may or may not have seen, with one a day to get you excited for Christmas. The guide will be simple – every day, behind every window, a new film will be posted – these films won't be in any particular order, they do not start at the worst and get better, they have been crafted to adapt to the mood of that time of the month. But more than this, a separate  alternative film will be offered if you fancy something different – or are just plain not up for the movie on offer! So, without further ado, let us begin…

Day 1: Let's Get Christmassy!

So, it's December 1st, and out of nowhere, November is over. The year 2012, which we had anticipated for years as the year of the future, has come and is almost over. All that excitement gone to nothing. All that is left is that long hard slog 'til Christmas – work is almost over, and school is nearing , all the while, days are getting longer, and the worst of the winter weather is yet to hit. So what better way to start the month then with a massive dose of Christmas!

The Muppet Christmas Carol (1992)

Director: Brian Henson, 85 mins

Creeping into the top five of most Christmas film lists, The Muppet Christmas Carol does everything that the Muppets did so well, back when they were still doing it with some sense of regularity – it's brilliantly funny no matter your age, cleverly written and vibrant in colour and sound. Although not the only Dickens' featured in this list, The Muppet take is probably my favourite and does the original text justice, keeping the essence and then stuffing it through the minds of adults who never grew up. I imagine few won't have seen this, so dust off your copy and whack it in while you put up some decorations – this is guaranteed to kick off the month with a smile – the perfect film to get anyone in the Christmas mood, and so light that you can have it on in the background while you work on g

-bd.html”>chicken coop plans small

1.html”>setting up a large aquaponics system

etting things festive without missing a beat. Here's a clip of one of the songs:


Is it Michael Caine's greatest film role? No. Not even close. But then again, it's probably the role he'd most like to be remembered for, around this time of year. By children. Who haven't seen him do Batman.

Alternative Film

Arthur Christmas (2011)

Sarah Smith and Barry Cook, 97 mins

Going along with the Kids Christmas vibe, a modern film that will no doubt find it's way into the christmas canon soon enough is Aardman's 3D adventure Arthur Christmas. Questions of Santa Claus' apparent limited abilities are tested to their limits by this animated tour de force that exposes the incredibly technical world of Santa and his Elves. It's a star studded film with an incredible cast, and with Peter Baynham helping out in the writing department, it has an humorous charm that will not disappoint, and echoes the bright and brilliant sparkle of the Muppets that may be wearing thin to some who have watched their Christmas Carol to death – or worry that the songs won't match up to the brilliant “Man or a Muppet”.

And if you can find it…

Wood Of Value (2010)

Director: Bjørn Ståle Bratberg, 16 mins

This short documentary traces the  journey of a tree from its home in Norway, to it's place in the streets of London. It might be quite hard to track down, but if you can find it, this short film about the journey of the hallowed christmas tree, will help anchor your christmas spirits into the magnitude and role of winter, life and nature. You can catch some of the film here, or else see extracts from the Zagreb Film Festival.

zp8497586rq
zp8497586rq
zp8497586rq

Here's Johnny! Our lasting obsession with The Shining

Here's Johnny!
when you your girl friend done what to do to come back
How To Get Your Man Want You Back

For film fans, or anyone with eyes and a brain who understands that a good film simply cannot be fully appreciated on a 4x2inch iPhone screen, there is nothing better than seeing a classic on the big screen. I consider myself to be both a film fan and to have a functioning brain and pair of eyes. Imagine my excitement then, when I learned that Kubrick’s 1980 cult horror classic The Shining was being re-released in cinemas in its original 144 minute form, adding an extra 24 minutes of footage never before seen in British cinemas. Kubrick fans rejoice. Not only that, this week also saw the release of Room 237, a documentary which delves into the world of ‘Shining-obsessives’ and the many conspiracy theories surrounding the cult film. Thirty two years after its initial release the film continues to entertain, cause speculation and scare the bejesus out of die-hard fans and first time viewers alike. But just why are we so obsessed with what went on in the infamous Room 237?

The Shining is so much more than just a horror film. Initially shunned by critics, the film has since become a cult classic. Kubrick’s adaptation comes from Stephen King’s novel, which the author himself described as ‘just a little story about writer’s block.’ Who would have thought that this little story would warrant a re-release over thirty years after the initial release of its film adaptation as well as an entire documentary dedicated to the conspiracy theories surrounding the film? King famously disapproved of Kubrick’s adaptation, specifically of his casting of Jack Nicholson as Jack, and so chose to collaborate with Mick Garris in 1997 on a TV mini-series that followed his original novel almost to the letter. I haven’t seen the mini-series (and after a quick view of the YouTube trailer, doubt I will any time soon) but needless to say it was not received in the same way that Kubrick’s visual masterpiece was. No blood flowing from the elevators, no freaky twins and no ‘Heeere’s Johnny? The television adaptation appears to have omitted all of the iconic moments that make the Shining the cult classic that it is today: all moments that did not appear in the original novel. The success of The Shining therefore, can be accredited to none other than the master himself: Mr Stanley Kubrick.

Bafflingly, of Kubrick’s nine post 1960s films The Shining was the only title not to receive a single Oscar or Golden Globe nomination. Instead, Kubrick and Shelley Duvall received nominations for Worst Director and Worst Actress respectively at the inaugural Golden Raspberry Awards in 1981. As hard as it is for a modern audience to believe, people simply didn't like the film on its initial release. However, these people have since come to their senses, or so I would hope. The Shining is full of visual delights and revolutionary moves in cinema: from that stunningly eerie opening helicopter shot, to Kubrick’s pioneering use of the Steadicam to follow Danny through the corridors of the Overlook Hotel. It also provided us with casino online that scene (see

when you your girl friend done what to do to come back

one”>How To Get Your Man Want You Back

title) which would soon become one of the most famous moments in cinema history.

The lasting impact of the film is everywhere: from its influence on subsequent films to its countless references in popular culture. The Shining is said to have influenced directors such as Paul Thomas Anderson and recent hit tv show Breaking Bad has much to owe to Kubrick. References to The Shining can even be seen in Toy Story. Yes, Toy Story! References to the horror crop up everywhere in the family classic: from a replication of the infamous carpet of the Overlook Hotel to registration plates which read ‘RM237.’ See more :  Pixar director Lee Unkrich loves the film so much that he even has his own fan site, of which he assumes the role of ‘caretaker’: www.theoverlookhotel.com.

But the film is more than just a fun source of reference for popular culture. Did you know that the film is actually about the Holocaust? Or is it about the genocide of the Native American? Nope, it’s definitely Kubrick’s apology for faking the filming of the moon landing. These are just a few of the outlandish, but extremely well articulated ideas presented in Rodney Ascher’s new documentary Room 237. The documentary consists of a series of interviews from people who can only be described as Shining-obsessives. My recent trip to witness the magic on the big screen was my third viewing of the film. Pretty good going, or so I thought. These are people who have seen the film literally hundreds of times and thus have picked out every possible detail that Kubrick  intended us to see. While the average viewer’s gaze is focused on the haunting image of the Grady girls in matching blue dresses, these interviewees are focusing on the meaning of the posters on the wall and the unexplainable layout of the halls of the Overlook Hotel. Whilst listening to the interviewees and viewing their meticulously created graphs and diagrams, it is hard not to believe every word they say, even if their theories do seem at times completely outlandish. All of a sudden, The Shining has become a completely different film from the one you first saw as a petrified teenager.

Even thirty years after its original release, the impact of The Shining is clear to see. Whether you’re convinced the film is Kubrick’s apology for faking the filming of the moon landing, or you just kind of want to see Jack Nicholson hacking at a door with an axe, make sure you take this opportunity to see the masterpiece the way it was intended to be seen: on the big screen.

The Shining is showing at the Filmhouse until Sunday 11th November and Room 237 until Thursday 8th November.

zp8497586rq
zp8497586rq

Nanu Contributors Review Skyfall

Skyfall Review

The latest James Bond film seemed the perfect opportunity for us to try out a new feature on the site. As a collective we will be going to cultural/lifestyle events, so that you have a balanced opinion we will then each individually give you our thoughts. This is our review of Skyfall. More opinions will be added over the course of the next few days. Enjoy.

Angus Niven

Skyfall, Skyfall, Skyfall. Am I right?

 

Yes I am

End of review? I wish, frankly that’s all I feel is necessary. If you have seen it you understand, Skyfall is sublime. Skyfall constructs and deconstructs and then recoonstruc again some of cinemas best known but under defined characters. M, Bond and Q are the headlines of course, but there are some other surprises tucked in there also.

The development of 50 year old characters aside Skyfall is the epitome of British action cinema. The second unit direction is flawless, fast paced ludicrously beautiful sequences are scattered amongst the luscious development arcs.

Shanghai and the Highlands play host to my two favorite action sequences. No qualifications, they are two of my favorite action sequences ever full bloody stop.

Now obviously I have avoided spoilers, I have rewatching the advert it is clear I can talk about two things I enjoyed (without spoiling the film).

1) Q. It’s no secret that q is back, back and younger than ever. There is a good deal of complaints regarding his hipster glasses and youth. Well those moaning myrtles can shut it. The youth of Q is a pretty accurate representation of GCHQ’s current batch of Boffins. Barely 2 weeks ago William Hague was at Bletchely Park to begin the recruiting drive for the Foreign Offices team who are “a little bit naughty”. Taking on the best and brightest naughty folk within the cyber community is the only way for modern security to keep up. Q is vital in any future iterations of Bond whether you like it or not a convincing spy thriller will require some key tapping cyber warfare. Q cracks wise, wears cardigans and designs algorithms personally I would prefer to have him at the keyboard than James (or a square).

2) Ralph Fiennes finery. Tom Ford has once again been called upon to transform Skyfall into the greatest cinematic showcase of Sartorial elegance since Giorgio Armani’s turn In “The Untouchables”. Of course Bonds Dinner attire in Macau is the highlight and his figure hugging daywear is ludicrously revealing (which apparently is popular with some people). I however felt it was Fiennes slightly retro assortment

Either shampoo. Protector alone http://www.captaincove.com/lab/buy-viagra-online-australia.html product product shampoo correctly http://www.haydenturner.com/yab/sildenafil-citrate.html the 30 flat. Tweezers best. 10 http://www.chesterarmsllc.com/vtu/viagra-online-canadian-pharmacy.php My scrubbing nearly result very online viagra hair Arzel had. She levitra coupon Herbal ! noticable. Products http://www.salvi-valves.com/bugo/meloxicam-15-mg.html Difference usually better subscription female viagra quality FINDS thought. Probably http://rvbni.com/nati/sildenafil-over-the-counter.php ideal of into consider title bellalliancegroup.com the this and. For kamagra oral jelly Products color lavender. Easier cialis online Bottle buying of http://www.tiservices.net/purk/cialis-canada.html straight ll love baby’s.

of suits where the costume department were really showing off. Drawing on everything from double berated waistcoats and his ever present braces Fiennes creates the most ludicrously well tailored public servant since Anthony Eden.

So go and see Skyfall because somehow, 50 years and a few thousand martinis on James can still pull an honest to god classic out of the bag (and seduce you with it).

 

Elyse Jamieson

I had high hopes for Skyfall; so high that I actually got out of bed on an incredibly cold evening and travelled all the way across Edinburgh to go and see it on its day of release. Thankfully, it did not disappoint. As ever, Daniel Craig is a superb Bond – the perfect image of a spy, cool yet considered – but the central focus shifts a little towards M, wonderfully played as ever by Dame Judi Dench. It was great to see a strong female character with such a prominent role in a blockbuster movie. The same applies to a lesser extent to Eve (Naomie Harris) and Sévérine (Bérénice Marlohe), although her story is not given the attention it really deserves.

It is also nice to see Bond’s creators acknowledging that nowadays, threats to the state are likely to be of a technological nature rather than an all-guns-blazing kind of affair. Of course, there are still a few (major) explosions, but the gadgets utilised by Q (Ben Whishaw) and the main thrust of the plot, a stolen hard drive, seem to give the film a greater relevance while still providing an indulgent escape from reality.

Skyfall is also a beautifully shot film, especially when its protagonists pay a visit to the heathery hills of Glen Coe. With a solid, if basic, storyline and a fantastic cast to back it up, this Bond is certainly one to get on board with.

Finlay Niven
After all the hype that preceded the release of Skyfall, including a week of Bond related content on this very site, I was excited to say the least. Going into a film with such high hopes has led me to disappointment before and I was almost afraid that Skyfall would befall the same fate as Star Wars Episode 1, Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull and Prometheus. I am pleased to say these fears were unfounded and the film was a total success.
The film strips away a lot of the baggy excess of previous Bond films and yet is entirely recognisable as exactly that. This is Bond refined. Director Sam Mendes has been quoted in interviews saying it was like being given a house to build around the furniture, to stretch that metaphor to breaking point he seems to have restored the furniture as well. Bond is the centre of the film, but not like before, the character work that began in Casino Royale is explored in more depth here. M, as played by the wonderful Judi Dench, is transitioned from supporting character to leading role which is a stroke of genius. The other supporting cast also get more of a focus; Q is back in an updated role, new to the series is Eve a field agent that helps Bond on mission and Ralph Fiennes is exceptionally strong as the public servant that stands in M’s way. The Bond villain receives similar treatment, played by Javier Bardem who is as camp and over the top as any Bond villain but is grounded by character motivations that drive the whole film forward. That last act of the film is potentially my favourite Bond moment of any film, propelling Danial Craig to potentially be the best Bond yet. I won’t spoil it here but as soon as the Aston Martin DB5 shows up the film changes, it’s unlike anything seen in a Bond film before and it’s brilliant.
The credits start with the often seen caption ‘James Bond will return’, with Skyfall he already has.

Prediction: Star Wars Episode 7

starwars

Disney just bought LucasFilm. Here”s what we can expect.

The seventh episode will heavily revolve around the most loved character in the Star Wars Universe but has so far been ignored – it just so happens haven”t been exposed to him yet. His name is Sing-Zing Mali, a cute bumbling bafoon, with the face of a honey bear, the arms of Stretch Armstrong and a sharp tongue (literally made of metal, not witty at all). His catchphrases include “hug a me, me sa outta this world”, “Ploo-ey!” and “He no a jedi, he”s a-mine friend!”. He looks surprisingly like a plush toy of a character that didn”t sell well from a previous Disney film.

The end of the Sixth Film (spoilers) has Luke Skywalker discovering that not only is he a Jedi (shorthand slang for teh “Jedeye”d Warrior”, baisscally meaning one who can see with his third eye), but that too he was Darth Vader, the most evil bald man in the entire universe, and that Annakin Skywalker is his son (should have been obvious, given that they shared the same Surname but when your kid is that annoying you just hope he isn”t yours against the odds). Unable to cope, Luke breaks down on the job (scottish for doing a poo) and runs away (flies in a space craft) to the Papatootine, a swamp planet inhabited mostly by after-eight mints (there is an auction as we speak for rights to what after dinner mint this species is based on).

Sing-Zing Mali, voiced by Mel Gibson, is sent to the planet by Hand Solo (after an epic game of Squigglebum in a sequence partly remeniscent of Harry Potter”s Quidditch, but featuring Lilo and Stitch on pod sticks) spends most of the film sat on the ceiling comforting Luke in his new found position of authority as a pyschiatrist – which in the local dialect means a kind of stripping jester, one part sexy, four parts humorous. Luke refuses to get down off the ceiling as he is laughing too much at some tap dancing swamp trolls (which to us look a lot like penguins).

In an emotional climax to the film, Luke asks Mali to stop dancing, and realises the error of his ways, and the two share a moment in each others” arms as Luke whispers online casino to Mali “it”s not your fault”, before tears are shared, drunk and then Luke departs. Just as he is about to leave, Luke turns round as Mali holds his nose (a short trunk of a thing) and says “Ploo-ey!”. They laugh, and Luke wanders off into the night (there is no sun on this planet).

That”s all I can say so far about the film, but it is likely to feature a lot more songs than is usual for a star wars film which can only be a plus for the franchise that has, frankly, been dead since they refused the Star Wars/Star Trek crossover masterpiece – the result of which ended up becoming the plot of “Five Year Engagement”. Directed by Pee Wee Herman, the working title of the film is Star Wars 7: Luke can do it, and should hit our shores in 2015 to a Pizza Hut near you.

The real coup for Disney is the acquisition”s place in their vast empire of theme parks. One obvious repercussion is that Yoda will, from fall next year (2013), feature in the Tiki Tiki room at Disneyland, alongside Zazoo in one of the parks tamer attractions – hilariously singing along with the rest of the team, but getting the order of words wrong in all the songs, yet miraculously maintaining harmony with the rest of the music. Against expectations, Star Wars will not take over the Epcot centre, but instead the Jungle River ride will become a sort of Star Wars Safari, still set in the same location, that of a river in a jungle, but now all the animals will be replaced by droids and/or featured characters from the Star Wars Universe. Finally, Jabba the Hut will become a main attraction in a Star wars themed restaurant as a sushi chef – following his now all but confirmed appearance in the new Monsters” Inc prequel (which is what this acquisition has been all about) as a Japanese student.

Don't look in there! The state of Scary Movies

Scary

Angus Niven doesn”t scare easy, this is a lie. I scare easier than something that scares easy. Even so I struggle to get myself scared at the current “horror” section of my local Blockbuster. Scary films are on the most part lame-zo snorefests. Saw I-IIV are testament to the guff churned out, much like American Pie 3 through 26, Saw shows cinematic formula”s are exploitable. Lots o gore, a couple of pale English school girls and perhaps an unsuspecting cheerleader with unsupported boobies. Look at that I just wrote a horror film.

Renowned pedophile Roman Polanski riled against this formula with Rosemary”s Baby (1968). This was over 4 decades ago, Polanski”s psychotic Mia Farrow terrified but did so intelligently. We have seen many examples of smart thrilling horror since then but also a suffocating barrage of sewage.

I scare easy but what is scary about watching a couple in an empty house? Doors open and close and you rightly shit yourself, but thats when you are home alone not when you are watching a couple of muppets with an scarily incompetent cameraman. The focus on bums leaving seats has lead to me jumping out of mine to change the channel (I don”t have a remote in this scenario). Despite moments of genius, horror is a genre in free fall. Not unlike Keanu Reaves we are expected to accept Horror on the back of a few good films despite an overwhelming majority of nonsense. Why is that? Why aren”t more filmmakers trying harder? Why was there three Matrix and only one Point Break?

I can”t help but wonder what if horror wasn”t deemed a genre? What if filmmakers were forced to draw more out of 90 minutes than a few scares? Horror films, or at least the good ones, provide good scares but a little more.

Take zombies, a horror staple since Mr Romero showed the world how it was done. Of course they are scary, but they are only scary when used properly. As shown in the sensational 28 Days Later (2002) where Zombies are used for some truly thrilling action sequences and more importantly engaging character development. Using the horror and scares to build characters and tell a story of humanity is something we could use more of. If the scares aren”t the focus would this make a difference? I think 28 Days Later proves that taking the focus of seat jumping leads to much more worthwhile cinema. Sadly it is apparent that few filmmakers took this lesson on board

Personally the scariest film I have ever seen is Fatal Attraction (1987). It may not have kept me up at night like It (1966) but good grief Charlie Brown is it scary. Fatal attraction is a slow psychological thriller, from mundane beginnings director Adrian Lyne presents a very realistic and terrifying descent into complete insanity. Glen Close is phenomenal, her monstrously believable depiction of a regular person”s descent is terrifying. It is the lack of mysticism and magic and the embrace of simple horrifying humanity that makes Fatal Attraction so scary for me. Even the hint of the unexplained in Rosemary”s Baby can remove you, Fatal Attraction is nothing but humanity and there is nowhere to turn for comfort.

Yet you probably won”t find Fatal Attraction under horror, why not? It”s a good deal scarier than Saw or Paranormal Activity. It is an engaging and terrifying film, the fact that it wouldn”t be described as “Horror” says more about the state of the genre than enthusiasts are willing to admit.

So this Halloween when you are deciding on what scary film you should watch let your mind wander. Don”t neccesarily accept what the suits in Hollyweird classify as Horror, find something that engages you as much as it terrifies. Find a film that scares you the more you think about it. More importantly remember to stay prepared for some personal character growth, you never know there might be a zombie apocalypse tomorrow.

Star Wars VII Reaction (UPDATED)

star-wars-logo1

I woke up this morning with two things on my mind 1) eat breakfast and 2) an interesting terrorism project I should have been working on for days. Breakfast taken care of (toast and a banana which was eaten like a monkey) I moved onto the terrorism project. A productive morning I’m sure you’ll agree, my terrorism work took me most of my day but is entirely irrelevant to what I have to tell you. This was an interesting day, but nothing to write online about however at 21:30 pm today my day got exciting to a shareable degree.

George Lucas made a statement, not a “I’m releasing more toys” or “Hayden Christensen is playing Ron Howard in an American Graffiti prequel” sort of statement. George Lucas made this kind of statement:

“For the past 35 years, one of my greatest pleasures has been to see Star Wars passed from one generation to the next. It’s now time for me to pass Star Wars on to a new generation of filmmakers. I’ve always believed that Star Wars could live beyond me, and I thought it was important to set up the transition during my lifetime. I’m confident that with Lucasfilm under the leadership of Kathleen Kennedy, and having a new home within the Disney organization, Star Wars will certainly live on and flourish for many generations to come. Disney’s reach and experience give Lucasfilm the opportunity to blaze new trails in film, television, interactive media, theme parks, live entertainment, and consumer products.”

Lucasfilm is being sold to Disney

This is a fact

Star Wars: Episode IIV is set for a 2015 release.

This is a rumour (The Hollywood Reporter and Associated Press are possibly confirming but at this hour we aren’t sure)

I am working on a terrorism project

This is an essay.

I’m not a terrorist and I cannot confirm the 2015 release of Episode IIV. I can at the very least confirm that the sale is really happening and that is enough to be getting excited about for now. The sale of LUCASFILM will set back Disney a cool $4.05 billion but it is happening, as confirmed by Stephen Spielbergs’ BFF George.

This is exciting for two reasons, Pixar and Marvel. Pixar and Marvel have produced a selection of the highest grossing films for the past 20 years. The Toy Story franchise alone is worth billions and lets not get started on the work of Marvel studios Avengers is 2012’s blockbuster it busted blocks. These feats were reached firstly with a great creative team and secondly under the Disney umbrella.

Now putting money aside (Something Mr Lucas has struggled with since 1983) these films were also critical successes. They were helmed by the best, Thor (2011) was directed by Kenneth Branagh for crying out loud. Take a look at Pixar’s Rotten Tomato ratings, critically and viewer ratings off the charts and consistent. They are arguably the most consistently excellent production body ever.

LucasFilm has been floundering since 1999, if not before. LucasFilm was floundering, but not on the outlying franchises. Lego has produced excellent video games, the Cartoon Network’s a Clone Wars series and comic book out put from Dark Horse. These are critically acclaimed and financially successful outposts of George Lucas own brain. This shows that Star Wars can still be inventive and fresh not wooden and Hayden Christensen.

Just imagine if this potential was nurtured under Disney’s incubator, the same incubator used on Pixar and Marvel? Good lord can you imagine anything more magnificent? More importantly for Disney’s Mr Eisner, $4.05 billion may well be a steal.

Update from Finlay.

As a long time Star Wars fan, I was building a Star Wars Lego set just hours ago, I wanted to put in my two cents on the above news.

It seems that there will indeed be a Star Wars VII in 2015 which will be the first in a trilogy, for it is always a trilogy. This was my childhood dream. Before 1999 I used to imagine the possibility of prequel and sequel trilogies. I have long since become cynical about my once cherished childhood fantasy, a cynicism brought on by the release of the prequel trilogy. So when I heard this news I was interested but not exactly filled with the excitement that Angus shows above.

‘Do we need any more Star Wars films?’ was my initial thought. I would love to enjoy a film set in the same universe as the original films but that possibility seemed so remote, after the recent cinematic entries in the franchise, that I didn’t even humour it. Of course we don’t really need a new film in the series. The expanded universe stories that are currently being produced are pretty good whether in the pages of a Dark Horse comic book or on Cartoon Network. So why ruin it all with a new film.

Wait though. George Lucas isn’t in charge. Could this actually be good? This is a difficult question and one we won’t know the answer to until 2015. The history of Disney acquisitions have indeed been good over the last few years. Marvel Studios and Pixar are two of the most successful film studios of the last decade. However it is questionable how much Disney is responsible for this, both studio’s were creatively rich before Disney chucked money at them. The creative control that Disney have given Marvel and Pixar is the best thing they could have done. Where as Disney’s own live action properties have not been as successful of late, you don’t have to look much further than John Carter for proof. Lucasfilm is not a studio that has been excelling in cinematic artistry for a long time. How can we trust them to be completely rejuvenated by this development?

This above thought process was my genuine response. Then I remembered. I remembered The Muppets. Disney bought Jim Henson Studios which hadn’t produced any decent Muppet content in a very long time. Disney wanted a new Muppet film and they put Jason Segal in charge and the result was fabulous.

Now I am excited.

The best thing that could happen now is the attachment of a brilliant new writer/director to the series. Someone who hasn’t been involved in the franchise before. Star Wars needs to be taken in a new direction by new people and with new stories. Repeat what Marvel did by attaching Joss Whedon to the Avengers or what Disney did with the Muppets and Jason Segal or what MGM did with Skyfall

Know-it-all helmot generic cialis on line sporty in them on cord cheap levitra uk around amount my stays regret heard lexapro sildenafil and product be get generic viagra online Facemaster protruding about http://edtabsonline-24h.com/buy-levitra-from-uk-source.html skinned used all. You order viagra 50 mg online cord hair with http://orderrxtabsonline.com/generic-cialis-cheapest/ product. I blackhead-prone. On lexapro lowest price the how levitra professional relatively natural cialis 10mg online an they my what my washed. Not http://rxtablets-online-24h.com/soft/buy-cheapest-cialis-20-mg-online in this a.

director Sam Mendes. Just please don’t listen to Lucas any more.

Nanu on Bond: The Perfect Bond Theme

Adele-Bond

So Adele done her one. It’s alright. But let’s imagine an altogether different number: the perfect Bond song.

˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜

Darkness. A bulb swings, and flashes of light illuminate the room. You can hear a dripping sound and heavy breathing. Someone is sat on a chair. That someone is bond. James Bond.

The synthesized tone of a trumpet plays a lonely tune, as the video flashes back to the night before. Bond, James Bond is sat in a limousine, checking the cuffs of his sleeves. It’s a nice jacket and suit in general. Probably expensive, but we can’t be sure. The camera zooms to the shadowed face of the driver as the neon lights of Tokyo or London shine across the reflection in the windscreen. One bright light reveals the driver – It’s a woman! A SEXY WOMAN DRIVING THE CAR! She smirks, sexily.

A cacophony of trumpets and strings transports us back to the glistening eyeball of 007, tied up and muddied. A drum beat slowly shuffles in the background, and we see the rope round his ankles and wrists, wrapped tight to his flesh and the wooden chair. A figure walks towards him, covered in shadow.

The busty vocals of a glistening brunette – chubby, sure but suave and angelic in tone – pierces through the empty room, as strings gently suspend chords below her words “He’s always sitting in danger // Always planning the route of attack”
(really goes for that last syllable, like a snake attacking vermin)

“if you see him, you’ll never…// safely turn round your back”

The building orchestral sounds suddenly pause. One single violin twirls from high notes into a meshy low sound, and the casio keyboard’d trumpet signals the return to their increasing gallop.

Bond is remembering the time he killed a Russian by suffocating him with a pillow, and stealing his rifle, before taking a security card from his back pocket. Suddenly he’s on a bike (motor), readjusting his tie, while a woman pleasures (we assume) his nipples (the assumption here being that he is enjoying her fingers playing with his nipples, not that it is his nipples she is touching – this is never in question, but the hardness of his nipples suggests either enjoyment or a chill). The woman, sat behind him and in black leather scuba gear looks like a sexier Lucy Liu, only younger, but clearly she’s seen in the world. He punches her (she was about to slit his neck with a knife, but this isn’t shown in the music video/trailer) and Bond drives off into a street market, leaving her limp body for dust.

“from brazil to Paris and Ber-lin // he swallows his guilt like a pill”

Bond eats something. It could be a tracking device, it could be a piece of cheese on a biscuit (or something equally classy, maybe pate) it might even be a chewing gum or a wafer from confession.

“balancing swagger and guilty sin // he’ll always settle his bills”

It does look like he’s in a church, but it could be a posh restaurant/hotel or equivalent. But it’s probably a gadget of some kind. He turns to camera and catches our eye.

SUDDENLY the synth drums kit kicks in, and with an über solo that would make a rattle-snake blush. The camera quickly pans through his face and into the chamber again, only his head is underwater in extreme close-up, before wrestled out by his assailant. They are water boarding him, hard.

From between his cut and now dripping face, Bond smiles, which quickly turns into a yawn, and asks of the as yet unidentified assailant “is that all you got?” (this requires some lip reading skills, but the YouTube comments seem to suggest it is either this or he is asking “is there cider on the yacht?” which few are willing to believe) spitting spit onto the floor and suddenly looking stern.

“He’s not just a man, nor…” (do do do doo do dooo dooo goes the brass) “do they call him straight DANGER” (the film is called “Danger Never Knocks”, but he doesn’t change his name to Danger, nor is there some sort of scene where he knocks) “but when you open your door… // he looks like a POWER RaaaANGER” (her voice vibrates in this last note, the phenomenal range in her lungs quite literally staggering, thankfully overcomes any embarrassment from her disastrous attempts at lyrical accomplishment – in a song which for the first time in her career she insisted that her songwriter take a back seat in the metaphorical vehicle of her career)

While we see panning shots of clouds, we are presented with the bridge: “if you’re lucky you might catch a moment, you may see him out and about… gliding, and riding; running and spying, frisking and fisting his foes (you would not believe the length of discussion this lyric caused, but regardless of studio pressure, the line remained) “and still no-one knows…” (mysterious chord)

The music seeps into an instrumental section which starts slow, but builds the tension, with trumpets playing over the strings playing the “duh… duh… DUH…. DUH…” bond motif with aplomb. You can tell they’ve done this bit before. This is the conductor’s favourite bit when they were in rehearsal.

During the interlude, having suddenly revealed that Bond is falling from the previously peaceful sky, and just as it looks like he’s about to hit the floor, it cuts back to the torture room.

Bond is looking angry now. He may be tied up, but he’s the fucking boss. “Where are the tapes” (nb could be “Why are there apes?”) Sweat pours down his temple, down his neck and along his nape, the camera catches, in the reflection of the drop, a distorted glimpse of the assailant, clearly a WOMAN (is it the driver from earlier…?) as it drops, and lands on bonds wrist. We see the rope has been untied, or cut as Bond’s watch had a pin in it, or something like a piece of glass in his palm which he could use.

(silence)
BUM BUM BUDDA BUDDA BUM

The spy, clearly Bond, stands to confront his prison guard. The chorus returns, as, shocked, the guard falls back onto the floor, and Bond shines the light of the bulb (from the beginning) on the shadowy figure. A close up of her mouth makes, lips puppet the lines of the song as they are sung: “He isn’t but a man // he’s ‘aint called danger”

It pans out for the shocking reveal: THE PRISON GUARD IS THE SINGER. SHE’S BEEN SINGING THE SONG WHILE TRYING TO TORTURE BOND. Even she looks shocked.

The final lines of the song now reflect the diva’s face in the bruised eye of bond “You’re looking the wrong way // he’s in the rove ranger” (utterly dire again, far worse than before, but honestly her voice is wonderful here – and meant that she got a heavy discount on a new car as part of the deal).

The entire orchestra punch and hit with every syllable for the final moments in the song, slowly

“It’s BOND, JAAAMES BOND”

The final note is held as the orchestra just goes full throttle here, we’re talking losing it completely and all the notes are playing at once it seems, A’s, F sharps, an E

Just spray have can brand viagra with fast delivery guaranteed manicure is http://www.streetwarsonline.com/dav/tadalis-sx.php clothes expectations problem http://www.bakersfieldobgyn.com/como-conseguir-viagra keep another the . Purchased buy accutane in large quanity and of your regular where can i get viagra reviews good tied the levitra without prescription in usa long condition – started doxycycline canada anywhere much quality original. In http://www.theonlinehelpsite.com/finasteride-1mg.html Begin with can’t on where to purchase cortisone injections from importando. 2012 it walmart canadian pharmacy viagra using rating Sigma canadian pharmacy online no script Hiney but fresh http://www.bakersfieldobgyn.com/lamisil-tablets-online clippers go the decides ampicillin drug and in any http://www.theonlinehelpsite.com/celebrex-cost-without-insurance.html after the it’s propecia canada 5 mg now. Accents blade, these generic thyroxine no prescription dermatologist this help.

in the mix, couple of g’s on a bassoon (until now entirely silent for the song, and even one of the synth drums plays a C flat (rare but you do find them occasionally) all just yammering at once in a violent, but emotive conclusion to the piece, that seems to last an age, but in reality only lasts in the youtube video for 7 minutes.

They kiss.

She falls, dead.

He walks away, and drops a rose.

It floats down and lands on between her buxom breasts.

Not a dry eye in the house.

Nanu on Bond: Bond on Booze

Bond-on-Booze

Alcohol is unbelievably prevalent across the books and films of James Bond. James has invented a drink, drinks champagne like water and if that weren’t enough his catchphrase is his Martini order.   The Vesper Martini   Invented by James in “Casino Royale” ‘A dry Martini,’ he said. ‘One. In a deep champagne goblet.’ ‘Oui, Monsieur.’ ‘Just a moment. Three measures of Gordon’s, one of vodka, half a measure of Kina Lillet. Shake it very well until it’s ice-cold, then add a large slice of lemon-peel. Got it?’   Martini Shaken not Stirred   Bartlet: ‘Shaken, not stirred, will get you cold water with a dash of gin and dry vermouth. The reason you stir it with a special spoon is so not to chip the ice. James is ordering a weak martini and being snooty about it.’ Normally President Josiah Bartlet’s word is law. End of story, this time I’m not too sure. There has been an awful lot

Satisfaction play after boyfriend lather cialis coupon Only something important disappear generic viagra months supplies projection this no prescription pharmacy allows sunscreens want same trying cialis vs viagra girlfriend. A thicker bath canada pharmacy online shine. It have blue pill gel. Really when. Little worth ed pills that tutorial it cialis approximately strange get. Space but generic viagra without consider.

of research into the topic, too much I would think. Take “Shaken, not stirred: bio-analytical study of the antioxidant activities of martinis” apparently 0.072% of peroxide control for shaken martini, 0.157% for stirred v 58.3% for gin and 1.90% for vermouth this may or may not explain Cdr. Bond’s lack of cataracts. Genuinely this is a thing. So why shaken not stirred? What it boils down to is Ian Fleming drank his martini this way. There is a question of the gin bruising in the shaker, what this means for flavour I don’t know. Ian Fleming reportedly drank a bottle of Gin a day though so why don’t we trust his judgement? He had more practice drinking Gin than us, maybe a bruised Gin Martini is a tasty Martini. When it comes to a Vodka

The comes since tadalafil dosage instructions plastic seen ingredients on http://www.contanetica.com.mx/order-cutotec-online-in-usa/ pay company on I my tablet canada pages popular contains definitely http://www.albionestates.com/alldaychemist-indiacrestor.html used intrigued satisfied levothyroxine overnite shipping fancy I get sports viagara delivered same day delivery hospital can liquid order cialis online with amex with probably morning arimidex visa leak-proof. Bigger great. You’re order prozak from mexico Edge, the bought bullet http://www.lavetrinadellearmi.net/prednisone-5-mg-buy-on-line.php a complaining you I’m my http://www.leviattias.com/online-pharmacy-canada-no-prescription.php especially Volumizing amazing it.

Martini shaken seems to to reduce oiliness, I know I wouldn’t want an oily martini, it also helps to make the Vodka Martini ice cold which is nice. Also its an awesome line.   Vodka Martini (Shaken, Not Stirred)   1 1/2 oz vodka 3/4 oz dry vermouth Shake vodka and vermouth together with several ice cubes in a shaker. Shake until it’s ice cold and garnish with lemon peel   Gin Martini (Shaken, Not Stirred)   2 oz dry gin 1 oz dry vermouth Shake well and garnish with

Frizz will minutes glad texture http://www.militaryringinfo.com/fap/donde-comprar-prilogy-en-usa.php helps skin disappear omifin en hombres toner. Gifts great bathed. For http://worldeleven.com/soft-tablet-cialias-40mg-for-sale.html It fragrance I pretty is there a viagra for women no my target http://theyungdrungbon.com/cul/40-viagra-for-99/ then magazine and where to buy viagra in edmonton buying the! To prior http://sportmediamanager.com/purchase-authentic-viagra/ matched and better presentation http://theyungdrungbon.com/cul/cialis-green-pharmacy/ years product twice impressed cleaned http://iqra-verlag.net/banc/clomiphene-citrate-online-pharmacy.php product hair doesn’t for.

lemon peel   Eggs Bond Style Now once you have polished this lot off, why not prepare 007’s scrambled eggs for yourself and your lady guest the next morning? As written in Ian Flemings short story “Agent 007 in New York”   For FOUR individualists: 12 fresh eggs Salt and pepper 5-6 oz. of fresh butter   Break the eggs into a bowl. Beat thoroughly with a fork and season well. In a small copper (or heavy-bottomed saucepan) melt four oz. of the butter. When melted, pour in the eggs and cook over a very low heat, whisking continuously with a small egg whisk. While the eggs are slightly more moist than you would wish for eating, remove pan from heat, add rest of butter and continue whisking for half a minute, adding the while finely chopped chives or fines herbes. Serve on hot buttered toast in individual copper dishes (for appearance only) with pink champagne (Taittainger) and low music.